Others titles
- Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty: Management of Hip Fractures
- AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management
- Mortality in the Management of Hip Fractures
- Bone Cement Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures
- Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures
- Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures
- Cemented Versus Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures
Keywords
- Hip Fractures
- Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty
- Mortality in the Management of Hip Fractures
- Hip Fractures in the Elderly
- Bone Cement for Fractures
- Neck of Femur Fracture
- Femoral Neck Fracture
- Hip Arthroplasty
Cemented VS Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures
This dataset shows moderate evidence that supports the preferential use of cemented femoral stems in patients undergoing arthroplasty for hip fractures of the femoral neck.
Get The Data
- ResearchNon-Commercial, Share-Alike, Attribution Free Forever
- CommercialCommercial Use, Remix & Adapt, White Label Log in to download
Description
Randomized controlled trials have largely failed to demonstrate differences (Deangelis et al 84, Figved et al 85), with the exception of fracture risk, which appears to be higher in press-fit stems (Taylor et al 86). This remains an infrequent event in other studies. In general, both approaches yielded acceptable functional results with low complication rates.
As with all surgical procedures, there are potential risks and benefits which are unlikely to be affected by this recommendation. Long-term studies designed specifically to elucidate potential differences in postoperative fracture risk between cemented or press fit stems are needed.
About this Dataset
Data Info
Date Created | 2014-09-05 |
---|---|
Last Modified | 2014-09-05 |
Version | 2014-09-05 |
Update Frequency |
Never |
Temporal Coverage |
1991-2012 |
Spatial Coverage |
United States |
Source | John Snow Labs; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS); |
Source License URL | |
Source License Requirements |
N/A |
Source Citation |
N/A |
Keywords | Hip Fractures, Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty, Mortality in the Management of Hip Fractures, Hip Fractures in the Elderly, Bone Cement for Fractures, Neck of Femur Fracture, Femoral Neck Fracture, Hip Arthroplasty |
Other Titles | Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty: Management of Hip Fractures, AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management, Mortality in the Management of Hip Fractures, Bone Cement Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures, Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures, Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures, Cemented Versus Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures |
Data Fields
Name | Description | Type | Constraints |
---|---|---|---|
Study | Description of the previous studies used in this research. | string | required : 1 |
Outcome | Description of the reported outcomes from the participants who underwent either Cemented or Uncemented Arthroplasty. | string | required : 1 |
Time | Description of the duration of the treatment whether Cemented or Uncemented Arthroplasty. | string | required : 1 |
Group_1 | Description of the type of procedure used in the first group. | string | required : 1 |
Group_2 | Description of the type of procedure used in the second group. | string | required : 1 |
Population_Size | Shows the number of participants or population size in a certain group that received either Cemented or Uncemented Arthroplasty. | integer | level : Ratiorequired : 1 |
Statistic | Description of the measurable characteristic of a sample population. | string | - |
Result | Results of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Probability | Effectiveness of the result based on the hypothesis of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Study_P_Value | Statistical significance of the results of the study. | string | - |
Favors | Description of which method is more effective. | string | required : 1 |
Data Preview
Study | Outcome | Time | Group 1 | Group 2 | Population Size | Statistic | Result | Probability | Study P Value | Favors |
Deangelis et al 2012 | Mortality | In-hospital | Cemented arthroplasty | Press-fit hemiarthroplasty | 130 | % risk difference | -1.0 | 0.983 | NS | |
Deangelis et al 2012 | Mortality | 1 month | Cemented arthroplasty | Press-fit hemiarthroplasty | 130 | % risk difference | 5.1 | 0.265 | NS | |
Deangelis et al 2012 | Mortality | 2 months | Cemented arthroplasty | Press-fit hemiarthroplasty | 130 | % risk difference | 4.6 | 0.5589999999999999 | NS | |
Deangelis et al 2012 | Mortality | 1 year | Cemented arthroplasty | Press-fit hemiarthroplasty | 130 | % risk difference | 3.1 | 0.8109999999999999 | NS | |
Figved et al 2009 | Mortality | 7 days | Cemented Hemiarthroplasty | Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty | 213 | Risk ratio | 0.73 | 0.67 | NS | |
Figved et al 2009 | Mortality | 30 Days | Cemented Hemiarthroplasty | Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty | 213 | Risk ratio | 0.49 | 0.23 | NS | |
Figved et al 2009 | Mortality | 90 Days | Cemented Hemiarthroplasty | Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty | 213 | Risk ratio | 0.84 | 0.63 | NS | |
Figved et al 2009 | Mortality | 12 Months | Cemented Hemiarthroplasty | Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty | 213 | Risk ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | NS | |
Figved et al 2009 | Mortality | 24 Months | Cemented Hemiarthroplasty | Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty | 213 | Risk ratio | 0.86 | 0.47 | NS | |
Santini et al 2005 | Mortality | 1 Year | Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty | Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty | 106 | Risk ratio | 0.93 | 0.82 | NS |