Others titles
- Traction Versus No Traction: Management of Hip Fractures
- AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management
- Traction Versus No Traction: Hip Fractures
- Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures
- Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Intertrochanteric Fractures
- Bucks Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip Fractures
- Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fracture
Keywords
- Hip Fractures
- Traction for Hip Fractures
- No Traction for Hip Fractures
- Traction for Hip Fractures in the Elderly
- Neck of Femur Fractures
- Intertrochanteric Fractures
- Bucks Traction
- Femoral Neck Fracture
Traction VS No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip Fractures
This dataset shows moderate evidence that does not support routine use of preoperative traction for patients with a hip fracture.
Get The Data
- ResearchNon-Commercial, Share-Alike, Attribution Free Forever
- CommercialCommercial Use, Remix & Adapt, White Label Log in to download
Description
Seven moderate strength studies (Anderson et al 17, Finsen et al 18, Needoff et al 19, Resch et al 20, Rosen et al 21, Saygi et al 22, Yip et al 23) compared skin traction to no traction. There was no difference noted between the two groups with regard to decreased pain or decreased doses of analgesia administered. A meta-analysis of the data showed that preoperative traction offered no benefit to hip fracture patients.
One high strength study (Resch et al 24) showed no difference in pain alleviation and number of analgesics administered when comparing skeletal traction to skin traction in hip fracture patients. However, half of the patients in the skeletal traction group found the application of skeletal traction to be painful.
About this Dataset
Data Info
Date Created | 2014-09-05 |
---|---|
Last Modified | 2014-09-05 |
Version | 2014-09-05 |
Update Frequency |
Never |
Temporal Coverage |
1993-2010 |
Spatial Coverage |
United States |
Source | John Snow Labs; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS); |
Source License URL | |
Source License Requirements |
N/A |
Source Citation |
N/A |
Keywords | Hip Fractures, Traction for Hip Fractures, No Traction for Hip Fractures, Traction for Hip Fractures in the Elderly, Neck of Femur Fractures, Intertrochanteric Fractures, Bucks Traction, Femoral Neck Fracture |
Other Titles | Traction Versus No Traction: Management of Hip Fractures, AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management, Traction Versus No Traction: Hip Fractures, Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures, Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Intertrochanteric Fractures, Bucks Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip Fractures, Traction Versus No Traction for Pain Management of Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fracture |
Data Fields
Name | Description | Type | Constraints |
---|---|---|---|
Study | Description of the previous studies used in this research. | string | required : 1 |
Outcome | Description of the reported pain outcomes from the participants in the research study. | string | required : 1 |
Duration | Description of the duration of time used for traction or no traction. | string | required : 1 |
Group_1 | Description of the type of traction used in the first group. | string | required : 1 |
Group_2 | Description of the type of traction used in the second group. | string | required : 1 |
Population_Size | Shows the number of participants or population size in a certain group that received the traction or no traction management. | integer | level : Ratiorequired : 1 |
Statistic | Description of the measurable characteristic of a sample population. | string | - |
Result | Results of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Probability | Effectiveness of the result based on the hypothesis of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Study_P_Value | Statistical significance of the results of the study. | string | - |
Favors | Description of which method is more effective. | string | required : 1 |
Data Preview
Study | Outcome | Duration | Group 1 | Group 2 | Population Size | Statistic | Result | Probability | Study P Value | Favors |
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | Admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 1 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 2 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 3 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 4 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 5 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 6 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | VAS Pain | 7 Day after admission | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | Pain: Analgesia doses | Day 1 | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS | |||
Anderson et al 1993 | Pain: Analgesia doses | Day 2 | Preoperative Hamilton-Russell skin traction with 2.3kg weight | No traction | 252 | >.05 | NS |