Others titles
- Quarterly Performance Of The Measures
- Quality Measures Reporting
- Corporate Plan And performance Reporting
Keywords
- Performance Report
- Quarterly Performance
- Performance Report 2016-2017
- Quarterly Report
- Report 2016-2017
Quarterly Corporate Plan and Performance
This dataset contains the list of the quarter Corporate Plan and Performance report of 2016-2017.
Get The Data
- ResearchNon-Commercial, Share-Alike, Attribution Free Forever
- CommercialCommercial Use, Remix & Adapt, White Label Log in to download
Description
Each year, the Council will publish an addendum to the Corporate Plan which sets out updated targets for the year ahead. The 2016-2017 update was agreed at Full Council on 4 April 2016.
In addition to the corporate plan, each Theme Committee has a Commissioning Plan that sets out the strategic priorities and performance measures for each committee. Similarly to the corporate plan, each year, the Council will publish an addendum for each commissioning plan which sets out updated targets for the year ahead. The 2016 2017 updates were agreed by theme committees in March 2016.
The Council’s Corporate Plan for 2015-2020 sets our vision and strategy for the next five years based on the core principles of fairness, responsibility and opportunity to make sure Barnet is a place:
– of opportunity, where people can further their quality of life
– where people are helped to help themselves, recognizing that prevention is better than cure
– where responsibility is shared, fairly
– where services are delivered efficiently to get value for money for the taxpayer
The most up to date information on the Corporate Plan can be found in the 2017-2018 Addendum to the Corporate Plan.
About this Dataset
Data Info
Date Created | 2017-01-05 |
---|---|
Last Modified | 2018-11-24 |
Version | 2018-11-24 |
Update Frequency |
Quarterly |
Temporal Coverage |
2016-2017 |
Spatial Coverage |
United Kingdom |
Source | John Snow Labs; London Borough of Barnet; |
Source License URL | |
Source License Requirements |
N/A |
Source Citation |
N/A |
Keywords | Performance Report, Quarterly Performance, Performance Report 2016-2017, Quarterly Report, Report 2016-2017 |
Other Titles | Quarterly Performance Of The Measures, Quality Measures Reporting, Corporate Plan And performance Reporting |
Data Fields
Name | Description | Type | Constraints |
---|---|---|---|
Indicator_Type | Indicator Type (Schedule Performance Index (SPI) and Cost Performance Index (CPI), like variances, allow you to assess the health of a project. In specific, SPI and CPI help you analyze the efficiency of schedule performance and cost performance of any project) | string | - |
Reference_Number | Performance Report Reference Number | string | - |
Indicator_Description | Indicator Description for performance report | string | - |
Polarity | Polarity of report ( State in which two ideas, opinions are completely opposite or very different from each other) | string | - |
Outturn | The actual amounts, results etc at the end, rather than those that were expected or calculated earlier. | string | - |
Target | Expected target for performance | string | - |
RAG_Rating | The RAG system is a popular project management method of rating for issues or status reports, based on Red, Amber (yellow), and Green colors used in a traffic light rating system. | string | - |
Previous_Outturn_Long_Term | Previous outturn fourth quarter 2015-2016 long term | string | - |
Direction_Travel_Long_Term | Long term direction of travel | string | - |
Benchmarking | Benchmarking of Report | string | - |
Data Preview
Indicator Type | Reference Number | Indicator Description | Polarity | Outturn | Target | RAG Rating | Previous Outturn Long Term | Direction Travel Long Term | Benchmarking |
CPI | AC/S3 (ASCOF 1G) | Percentage of adults with learning disabilities who live in their own home or with their family | Bigger is Better | 0.642 | 0.63 | Green | 0.5952 | Improving | 68.3% (CIPFA)69.1% (London)ASCOF Comparators (2014/15) |
CPI | AC/S4 (ASCOF 1E) | Percentage of adults with learning disabilities in paid employment | Bigger is Better | 0.09300000000000001 | 0.096 | Red | 0.09300000000000001 | Same | 9.8% (CIPFA)7.7% (London)ASCOF Comparators (2014/15) |
CPI | AC/S5 (ASCOF 1F) | Percentage of adults with mental health needs in paid employment | Bigger is Better | 0.0723 | 0.07200000000000001 | Green | 0.048 | Improving | 7.0% (CIPFA)5.5% (London)ASCOF Comparators (2014/15) |
CPI | AC/S6 (ASCOF 1H) | Percentage of adults with mental health needs who live independently, with or without support | Bigger is Better | 0.816 | 0.815 | Green | 0.804 | Improving | 79.6% (CIPFA)77.8% (London)ASCOF Comparators (2014/15) |
CPI | AC/S8 | Percentage of new clients, older people accessing enablement | Bigger is Better | 0.597 | 0.63 | Green Amber | |||
CPI | AC/S9 ASCOF2A (2) | Permanent admissions to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population age 65+ | Smaller is Better | 75.6 | 122.5 | Green | |||
SPI | AC/S16 (ASCOF 1C/2A) | Proportion of service users with a direct payment (ASCOF 1C/2A) | Bigger is Better | 0.392 | 0.401 | Red Amber | 0.392 | Same | 28.4% (CIPFA)26.0% (London)ASCOF Comparators (2014/15) |
SPI | AC/S17 | Number of new telecare packages installed* | Bigger is Better | 216.0 | 200.0 | Green | 119.0 | Improving | |
SPI | AC/S18 | Percentage of service users receiving ongoing services with telecare* | Bigger is Better | 0.138 | 0.138 | Green | 0.11900000000000001 | Improving | |
MPI | AC/S21 | Number of carersâ assessments | Bigger is Better | 194.0 | 209.0 | Green Amber |