Others titles

  • Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation for the Management of Hip Fractures
  • AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management
  • Mortality Rates in the Management of Hip Fractures in the Elderly
  • Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Intertrochanteric Fractures
  • Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures and Symptoms

Keywords

  • Hip Fractures
  • Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation
  • Hip Fracture Mortality Rates
  • Management of Hip Fractures
  • Hip Fractures in the Elderly
  • Intertrochanteric Fractures
  • Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Fracture Symptoms

Arthroplasty VS Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures

This dataset is a study of the strong evidence that supports arthroplasty for patients with hip fractures like unstable (displaced) femoral neck instead of internal fixation.

Log in to download
Complexity

Get The Data

For getting access to data download links please read and accept the end-user license agreement.
Your Data License
  • Research
    Non-Commercial, Share-Alike, Attribution Free Forever
  • Commercial
    Commercial Use, Remix & Adapt, White Label Log in to download

Description

These studies reported better outcomes for patients in whom internal fixation was avoided as the treatment of choice. A decreased rate of reoperation among patients treated with arthroplasty was the most consistent finding across the studies.

A meta-analysis on patients treated with hemiarthroplasty demonstrated no statistically significant difference in mortality. The benefit of implementing this recommendation will be the avoidance of reoperations in this frail patient population.

About this Dataset

Data Info

Date Created

2014-09-05

Last Modified

2014-09-05

Version

2014-09-05

Update Frequency

Never

Temporal Coverage

1981-2008

Spatial Coverage

United States

Source

John Snow Labs; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS);

Source License URL

Source License Requirements

N/A

Source Citation

N/A

Keywords

Hip Fractures, Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation, Hip Fracture Mortality Rates, Management of Hip Fractures, Hip Fractures in the Elderly, Intertrochanteric Fractures, Femoral Neck Fractures, Fracture Symptoms

Other Titles

Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation for the Management of Hip Fractures, AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management, Mortality Rates in the Management of Hip Fractures in the Elderly, Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Intertrochanteric Fractures, Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Femoral Neck Fractures, Arthroplasty Versus Internal Fixation Mortality in Elderly Hip Fractures and Symptoms

Data Fields

Name Description Type Constraints
StudyDescription of the previous studies used in this research.stringrequired : 1
OutcomeDescription of the reported outcomes from the participants who underwent arthroplasty or internal fixation.stringrequired : 1
DaysDescription of the duration of survival or mortality in days after an arthroplasty or internal fixation.integerlevel : Ratio
WeeksDescription of the duration of survival or mortality in weeks after an arthroplasty or internal fixation.integerlevel : Ratio
MonthsDescription of the duration of survival or mortality in months after an arthroplasty or internal fixation.string-
OthersDescription of the other durations of survival or mortality after an arthroplasty or internal fixation.string-
Group_1Description of the method used to manage hip fracture in the first group.stringrequired : 1
Group_2Description of the method used to manage hip fracture in the second group.stringrequired : 1
Population_SizeShows the number of participants or population size in a certain group that underwent arthroplasty or internal fixation.integerrequired : 1level : Ratio
StatisticDescription of the measurable characteristic of a sample population.string-
ResultResults of the study.numberlevel : Ratio
ProbabilityEffectiveness of the result based on the hypothesis of the study.numberlevel : Ratio
Study_P_ValueStatistical significance of the results of the study.string-
FavorsDescription of which method is more effective.stringrequired : 1

Data Preview

StudyOutcomeDaysWeeksMonthsOthersGroup 1Group 2Population SizeStatisticResultProbabilityStudy P ValueFavors
Skinner et al 1989Mortality2Hemi arthroplastyInternal fixation278>.05NS
Skinner et al 1989Mortality12Hemi arthroplastyInternal fixation278>.05NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality6Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.70.28NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality12Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.280.51NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality18Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.270.47NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality24Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.540.16NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality30Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.160.55NS
Davison et al 2001Mortality36Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Risk ratio1.320.25NS
Davison et al 2001Survival Time months36Cemented ArthroplastyReduction and internal fixation using an ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw (AHS) and a two- hole plate280Mean difference-14.4Yes, p=0.008AHS ‘Ambi’ compression hip screw
Parker et. al. 2002Mortality12HemiarthroplastyInternal Fixation455Risk ratio0.990.93NS