Others titles
- Management of Hip Fractures in the Elderly
- AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control: Pain for Hip Fractures
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip Bone Fractures
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip Fractures and Fracture Symptoms
Keywords
- Hip Fractures
- Preoperative Regional Analgesia for Hip Fractures
- Hip Fractures in the Elderly
- Regional Analgesia Versus Control
- Hip Bone Fracture
- Neck of Femur
- Femoral Neck Fractures
- Fracture Symptoms
Regional Analgesia VS Pain Control Management of Elderly Hip Fractures
This dataset shows strong evidence that supports regional analgesia versus control or improvement of preoperative pain in patients with hip fracture.
Get The Data
- ResearchNon-Commercial, Share-Alike, Attribution Free Forever
- CommercialCommercial Use, Remix & Adapt, White Label Log in to download
Description
Six studies inclusive of 593 patients used a prospective randomized clinical trial design to assess the effect of regional analgesia in reducing preoperative pain after hip fracture upon presentation to the emergency department (Fletcher et al 10, Foss et al 11, Haddad et al 12, Monzon et al 13, Mouzopoulos et al, and Yun et al 15).
These studies all used a technique of administration of a local anesthetic that results in temporary loss of nerve function in the fascia iliaca or femoral compartment of the injured hip. In each study the patients who received this agent reported significant reduction in reported preoperative pain on a visual analog scale.
About this Dataset
Data Info
Date Created | 2014-09-05 |
---|---|
Last Modified | 2014-09-05 |
Version | 2014-09-05 |
Update Frequency |
Never |
Temporal Coverage |
1995 to 2010 |
Spatial Coverage |
United States |
Source | John Snow Labs; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS); |
Source License URL | |
Source License Requirements |
N/A |
Source Citation |
N/A |
Keywords | Hip Fractures, Preoperative Regional Analgesia for Hip Fractures, Hip Fractures in the Elderly, Regional Analgesia Versus Control, Hip Bone Fracture, Neck of Femur, Femoral Neck Fractures, Fracture Symptoms |
Other Titles | Management of Hip Fractures in the Elderly, AAOS Guidelines on Hip Fracture Management, Regional Analgesia Versus Control: Pain for Hip Fractures, Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip Bone Fractures, Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip and Neck of Femur Fractures, Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures, Regional Analgesia Versus Control Pain for the Management of Elderly Hip Fractures and Fracture Symptoms |
Data Fields
Name | Description | Type | Constraints |
---|---|---|---|
Study | Description of the previous studies used in this research. | string | required : 1 |
Outcome | Description of the reported outcomes from the participants in the research study. | string | required : 1 |
Duration | Description of the duration of the peak length of time for the effect of the regional analgesia. | string | required : 1 |
Group_1 | Description of the methods used for the administration of the regional anesthesia in the first group. | string | required : 1 |
Group_2 | Description of the methods used for the administration of the regional anesthesia in the second group. | string | required : 1 |
Population_Size | Shows the number of participants or population size in a certain group that received the regional anesthesia. | integer | level : Ratio |
Statistic | Description of the measurable characteristic of a sample population. | string | - |
Result | Results of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Probability | Effectiveness of the result based on the hypothesis of the study. | number | level : Ratio |
Study_P_Value | Statistical significance of the results of the study. | string | - |
Favors | Description of which method is more effective. | string | required : 1 |
Data Preview
Study | Outcome | Duration | Group 1 | Group 2 | Population Size | Statistic | Result | Probability | Study P Value | Favors |
Foss et al 2007 | Block Success (Max Pain Relief) | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | Risk ratio | 16.0 | 0.01 | Favors FICB | |
Foss et al 2007 | Received Supplementary Opioids | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | Risk ratio | 1.0 | 1.0 | NS | |
Foss et al 2007 | Pain on 15° Leg Movement | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 1.00 | NS | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 10 pt VRS Pain on repositioning pt in bed | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 0.18 | NS | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 5 pt VRS Overall pain relief | 30 min | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 0.09 | NS | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 10 pt VRS Maximum pain relief at rest | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p< 0.01 | Favors FICB | |||
Foss et al 2007 | Maximum pain relief on movement elicited pain | Immediate | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 0.02 | Favors FICB | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 4 pt VRS Overall Pain Relief at Rest (30 min after block placement) | 30 min | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | NR | NR | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 10 pt VRS Pain on 15 deg leg lift | 30 min | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 0.32 | NS | |||
Foss et al 2007 | 10 pt VRS Pain on 15 deg leg lift | 60 min | Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade (FICB) | Systemic Morphine | 48 | p= 0.06 | NS |